<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: abour family court, any legal lawyer should appointment or himself will act as a lawyer?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://THECHILDCUSTODYGUIDE.COM/index.php/archives/232/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://THECHILDCUSTODYGUIDE.COM/index.php/archives/232</link>
	<description>Your Child Custody Questions Answered</description>
	<pubDate>Mon, 06 Sep 2010 18:06:32 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.7.1</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Bennet Raj J Advocate</title>
		<link>http://THECHILDCUSTODYGUIDE.COM/index.php/archives/232/comment-page-1#comment-139</link>
		<dc:creator>Bennet Raj J Advocate</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 08 Dec 2009 05:57:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://THECHILDCUSTODYGUIDE.COM/index.php/archives/232#comment-139</guid>
		<description>Your question shows u r Tamil

Family Courts constituted under FAMILY COURTS ACT, 1984. &#34;Family Court&#34; means a Family Court established under section 3 and try cases mentioned in section 7.

The court is for to try the cases under Personal Laws and suits relating to personal law - mainly Divorce, Restitution of Conjugal Rights, Annulment of Marriage as null and void, maintenance, Guardianship

The intention of the act is the parties to directly appear and avoid lawyer 

But due to the complicated procedures and legality, approach is only through Lawyer

Here. no vakalath necessary to the Lawyer and everything is in parties name directly. 

Lawyer will conduct the same in the name of assisting

Benefit? nothing special? to reduce the work load of usual court ok

Thro Lawyer is safe and good

Direct approaches may lead to touts interferance and they may highly charge u in the name of lawyer ok

What is the necessity to you to approach the court? r u party? or parent?

r u husband or wife? what is the problem to u? what remedy u want? what religion u belong? type of marriage? age of both parties, children if any

the above said basic details required to say remedy</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Your question shows u r Tamil</p>
<p>Family Courts constituted under FAMILY COURTS ACT, 1984. &quot;Family Court&quot; means a Family Court established under section 3 and try cases mentioned in section 7.</p>
<p>The court is for to try the cases under Personal Laws and suits relating to personal law - mainly Divorce, Restitution of Conjugal Rights, Annulment of Marriage as null and void, maintenance, Guardianship</p>
<p>The intention of the act is the parties to directly appear and avoid lawyer </p>
<p>But due to the complicated procedures and legality, approach is only through Lawyer</p>
<p>Here. no vakalath necessary to the Lawyer and everything is in parties name directly. </p>
<p>Lawyer will conduct the same in the name of assisting</p>
<p>Benefit? nothing special? to reduce the work load of usual court ok</p>
<p>Thro Lawyer is safe and good</p>
<p>Direct approaches may lead to touts interferance and they may highly charge u in the name of lawyer ok</p>
<p>What is the necessity to you to approach the court? r u party? or parent?</p>
<p>r u husband or wife? what is the problem to u? what remedy u want? what religion u belong? type of marriage? age of both parties, children if any</p>
<p>the above said basic details required to say remedy</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
